Adidas unable to maintain trade mark protection for “ordinary” three-stripe symbol
The popular German sportswear manufacturer failed to extend its trade mark three-stripe design in the European Union (EU). The ruling comes after previously having the trade mark approved and then declared invalid less than 2 years later.
Adidas commonly uses the three-stripe design throughout their branding, sportwear range, official teamwear and merchandise. As iconic and widely used as the branding might be, the design element of multiple parallel lines has been deemed to be too generic by an EU Court and therefore doesn’t meet the guidelines for a registered trade mark in Europe.
A brief trade mark history
In 2014, Adidas applied for registration of the following EU trade mark for clothing, footwear and header. The application had described the mark as consisting of three parallel equidistant stripes of identical width, applied on the product in any direction.
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) accepted registration of the trade mark, in favour of Adidas.
Adidas trade mark applied for in 2014
The Adidas three-stripe trade mark was challenged by Belgium's Shoe Branding Europe after an ongoing dispute between the two brands.
In 2016, following an application for declaration of invalidity filed by the Belgian undertaking Shoe Branding Europe BVBA, EUIPO annulled the registration of that mark on the ground that it was devoid of any distinctive character, both inherent and acquired through use.
According to EUIPO, the mark should not have been registered. In particular, Adidas had failed to establish that the mark had acquired distinctive character through use throughout the EU.
In the most recent ruling, the General Court of the European Union confirmed the invalidity of the Adidas three-stripe trade mark and dismissed the action brought by Adidas against the EUIPO decision.
The General Court ruled the three-stripe symbol to be an "ordinary figurative mark" and was not “distinctive” enough.
On 19 June 2019, a press release from the General Court of the European Union stated that “Adidas does not prove that that mark has acquired, throughout the territory of the EU, distinctive character following the use which had been made of it”. Read full release
Consequently, for Belgium's Shoe Branding Europe, the same EU court also ruled their own two-stripe trademark invalid in 2018, saying the stripes were too similar to those of Adidas.
What does this mean for Adidas?
There is no reason for Adidas to stop using the iconic three-stripe symbol in their branding. However, they will have less grounds to prevent other brands from using similar design elements in Europe.
European law states that Adidas can still appeal the decision. However, at this point it is difficult to predict whether they will make an appeal or not.
Adidas did release a statement explaining that the Court’s decision may only shape the way they use the design in Europe.
The statement read, "Whilst we are disappointed with the decision, we are further evaluating it and are welcoming the useful guidance that the Court will give us for protecting our three-stripe mark applied to our products in whichever direction in the future."
Adidas may have had more success trademarking the three stripes in context, for example three stripes applied to the side of a shoe, three stripes applied to the sides of exercise pants.
Examples of the three-stripe design used in Adidas clothing and packaging.
Since the news that Prince’s Estate have filed a United States Trade Mark Application for the colour purple, a lot of people were asking, “Can you trade mark a colour?”
Over the past year a growing amount of businesses are targeted by unofficial Intellectual Property (IP) organisations.
We also have a short attorney FAQ guide to assist you in preparing for the initial meeting and make it more valuable for you.
Your first consultation is free of charge.
WHAT OUR CLIENTS SAY
"I felt so comfortable with Philipp and with the team at Wynnes, that I didn’t need or want to go anywhere else for IP advice and protection."
"A friend of mine strongly recommended to see Ewen. As soon as I met with him and started discussing my idea, I knew that I was in capable hands."
"When we came to the office and showed Philipp a prototype, he really grasped the product and concept without having to double explain things which was great."
"It’s different for the little guys, being a small business and protecting your idea is quite expensive. Ewen understood that. Instead of trying to explain things in legal terms – he introduced the commercial way."