For businesses developing software, AI systems, fintech platforms, gaming technologies and other digital solutions, this is significant.Â
The Full Court confirmed that the correct test is whether the invention, considered as a whole, creates an artificially created state of affairs with economic utility. Importantly, claims must not be dissected or stripped of their computer implementation before assessing patentability.Â
The High Court’s refusal to intervene removes the lingering uncertainty. The position is now settled.Â
This development strengthens confidence in pursuing patent protection for computer-implemented technologies in Australia and may have important implications for both filing strategy and freedom to operate.Â
We explore what this means for innovators and applicants, and the practical steps businesses should now consider, in our full article.Â